TexasCHLforum.com

PappaGun wrote:Now that's down right funny.

Will you tell us what business?

If I saw that, I would be really tempted to pull the manager aside and make a fool of him; in a nice way of course.

Would you then be surprised if the manager thanked you and put up a fully compliant 30.06 sign?

No good could come from pulling the manager aside. Doing so might well get a resourceful RKBA advocate in hot water.

Oldgringo beat me to the keyboard by a couple of seconds here, but he definitely has the right idea - it's best to leave well enough alone.

With the current situation, everyone has what he wants and is happy.

Messing with it can't make that any better, but it sure could make it worse.

chuckybrown wrote:Saw this today posted on a building I went into today here in Houston. OHIO?

You are likely looking at one of the following 3 scenarios. Number 3 is my personal favorite:

1) The business wanted to post a sign prohibiting weapon possession, and they looked for the most comprehensive one available from a company that produces workplace safety and compliance signs without looking into legal requirements.

2) A company based in Ohio distributed the same signage to its locations in multiple states.

3) A sly RKBA advocate was ordered to post the property to prohibit weapon possession on the premises, and he or she quite consciously selected an impressive looking sign that has no legal standing in TX. The result is that everybody is happy. The boss and liberal employees get to enjoy the cool looking sign that they think makes them much safer, and the mentally competent employees and clients retain their ability to protect themselves. What's not to like?