TexasCHLforum.com

mr surveyor wrote:it might be best to just let it go. I don't think that "calling out" someone for confrontation is the proper way to handle the situation. I still believe that the old adage of "never have a battle of wits with the unarmed" fits this case well.

KC5AV wrote:

amber wrote:

frankie_the_yankee wrote: But in case you are right, I will now use the thread to point out that all those absolutist assertions about the 2A are a mass of legal and constitutional baloney. That they are supported by no court , constitutional scholars, or case law. Nor will they ever be supported by any court, constitutional scholar or case law. And the reason for that is that, like all other "unlimited" rights, they lead to absurd conclusions that society would never want and would never support. (I'm just waiting for the 2A to reach its "correct" status. I want to set up a string of vending machines selling MP-5's at the loading gates of our major airports.

Thank you for being the voice of reason and saying why we need stronger controls on assault weapons.

What exactly is an assault weapon? I've never seen one of those.

frankie_the_yankee wrote: But in case you are right, I will now use the thread to point out that all those absolutist assertions about the 2A are a mass of legal and constitutional baloney. That they are supported by no court , constitutional scholars, or case law. Nor will they ever be supported by any court, constitutional scholar or case law. And the reason for that is that, like all other "unlimited" rights, they lead to absurd conclusions that society would never want and would never support. (I'm just waiting for the 2A to reach its "correct" status. I want to set up a string of vending machines selling MP-5's at the loading gates of our major airports.