Well I don't dispute that at all. I was just making the point that stepping up in caliber doesn't always result in more harsh or uncomfortable recoil. Or in other words, felt recoil is much about the pistol design as it is about the caliber.KD5NRH wrote:You'd have a hard time convincing my wife of that.mr.72 wrote:FWIW a Kel Tec P32 has a pretty stout and uncomfortable recoil...
She hates the recoil of a Bersa .380, but shoots her P32 quite well.
One day we were out at the range and between myself and my friend we had the following:
Kel-Tec P32 .32
Kahr PM9 9mm
Beretta Cheetah .380
Sig 232 .380 (similar to a Bersa Thunder .380 AFAICT from the pictures)
Kahr CW9 9mm
M&W Sigma SW9VE 9mm
Of all guns, the Sigma had the least felt recoil and was the most comfortable to shoot. It was the biggest of the poly guns. The Kel-Tec P32 was worst of the poly guns most likely because of its small size. But the worst of all for recoil feel in your hand was the Sig 232 which beat the crud out of my right thumb like I was getting hit with a tack hammer every time. It's a lightweight, alloy frame gun that flexes little and doesn't dampen the recoil much at all. The bigger, heavier Beretta Cheetah was much lighter in recoil.
So I'm not surprised that a P32 has less felt recoil than a Bersa .380.