TexasCHLforum.com

Wienerdogtroy wrote:

pbwalker wrote:

Wienerdogtroy wrote: Derp derp, advocating the breakup of the Union. The case of Grant v. Lee (cert denied) settled this question.

Weiner,

Derp derp? Resorting to insults already? I asked how it was treason, and you have yet to answer it. Obviously, you don't have an answer, other than to throw around insults.

Since I'm "derp derp", why don't you point to me exactly where it is in this legal definition?
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/treason" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Advocating rebellion against your mother country fits the definition nicely.

Wienerdogtroy wrote:

pbwalker wrote:

Wienerdogtroy wrote:

VMI77 wrote:
Nonsense. It's not unconstitutional and it's not treason.

If you tried to rebel, the FBI and the US military will beg to differ. And yes, its treason.

How?

Derp derp, advocating the breakup of the Union. The case of Grant v. Lee (cert denied) settled this question.

Wienerdogtroy wrote:

VMI77 wrote:
Nonsense. It's not unconstitutional and it's not treason.

If you tried to rebel, the FBI and the US military will beg to differ. And yes, its treason.

canvasbck wrote:I signed the Texas one, even though it will mean nothing