TexasCHLforum.com

powerboatr wrote: that makes sense. I thought maybe the two guys doing the shooting took it after they killed the patsy. but a SD or usb stick is easy as pie and leaves no files.

Much easier than a hard drive for one of the guys to slip in his pocket before they leave.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... oting.html
Mandalay Bay security guard Jesus Campos left the country for Mexico just days after the Las Vegas shooting - despite suffering a gunshot wound and being a key witness in the investigation.

Bitter Clinger wrote:OK, I am going for the conspiracy theory:

He was set up by Soros funded thugs (the thugs did the actual shooting and left this guy with no priors as the patsy). The object of the mission was to drive the government into implementing an Australian type gun confiscation after which ISIS terror cells - already in the US as a result of Obama's wide open borders - proceed to massacre us all and establish the American caliphate.

Not bad, eh?

It makes at least as much sense as the FBI story.

The massacre was well planned and executed up through the last shot out the windows. A person has to wonder if the ending was also well planned and executed, leaving the police to find Paddock dead in the room full of Evil Black Rifles, most of which were not fired that night.

philip964 wrote:Well apparently Native Americans are not the only ones to hold the title of most dead from a mass killing.

Only one massacre can be the most deadly. The rest are runners up.

I think the author is blinded by his own biases. I doubt the MSM ignored the murders he lists because of the skin color of the victims. I think they turn a blind eye to the ones he lists, and other mass killings, because of the killers not because of the victims. The mass shootings being ignored by the MSM were done under the auspices of the government.

The MSM doesn't want to report things like that. If that was common knowledge, it would be obvious that gun control should be targeted at agents of the government, not private citizens. That doesn't fit their narrative.

Beiruty wrote:Why so many rifles?!! For a single shooter?

Really? What kind of photo op would the anti2Aers have with a single rifle?