TexasCHLforum.com

KaiserB wrote: A good way to defend against this is to respond calmly, and in a helpful manner. Perhaps if we all email him with our support to find the "responsible party", rather than ban the "responsible gun" it may quell this guys anger a bit and turn him to our side... the irony is he is a gun owner. He is quite angry from reading his rant, on the site.... although THE ALL CAPS IS DARN ANNOYING. I say we all email Mel with our prayers and offers to help find the person responsible. Take 2 minutes and type him a brief note: mel@50caldanger.org

It would be ironic to find out the bullet was an errant police training round.

Keith B wrote:One of the tactics used by anti's on anything they are attacking is 'baiting'. Any way they get to you and entice you into calling names or telling them they are ignorant, ranting about their unrealistic view, etc. just helps fuel their fire. As Charles said, emails and printed letters can be used as ammo to try and help them support their views.

The best method is to send factual information in a business like method, sympathizing with their plight but stating your case in the hope of educating them, OR just let them go on their way and hope they will eventually fade away. Most times cool level headed reasoning, even though it may not seem to be working quickly, is the best solution over time.