Point taken. I believe there are instances where minor traffic violations are excusable, as long as they are done to maximize the safety of all involved. If I'm on my bike and riding through a semi-busy street, I'll run a stop sign assuming that there are no cars in the immediate vicinity just because I believe it is safer for all involved if I just get my butt out of the way. However, if I come to a 4-way stop that has cars waiting to go in all directions, I'll stop with the rest of the cars, and definitely wait my turn, if not more, to ensure that I don't endanger myself or others by doing something that is not expected. I also never leave without my helmet, just because I was brought up that way, and I've had way too many close calls with kids running out in front of me or low hanging branches coming out of nowhere. I can't think of any experienced rider that thinks riding on a busy road without a helmet is a good idea. Just even the sight of a helmet on a biker gives a driver the notion that the biker has some sense of safety. No helmet gives the impression of recklessness.mr.72 wrote:Yes, you are absolutely right. When I am riding at night, I have a blinking red rear light (which, by the way, is not really legal in the state of Texas, but is extremely prudent) and at least a solid front light, maybe a blinking front light (definitely illegal in the state of Texas). I also never ever get on a bicycle without a helmet. I cleaned out my storage room last weekend and tossed two cracked bicycle helmets that serve as reminders of what might happen do my skull if I fail to wear a helmet.agbullet2k1 wrote: Applying your earlier logic (trail riders vs. walkers), legal != prudent.
However, just like bicycles and hikers understanding what is likely, prudent, or expected on the trail, drivers can benefit greatly from trying to understand why bicycles do what they do on the road so when they do something it is not so unexpected. I run red lights all the time on my bike. Mostly I do it in order to avoid interacting with cars. Dogmatic insistence that the "rules of the road" or the traffic laws should apply identically to all vehicles from bicycles to semi trucks doesn't make any sense. There is no way that an exposed rider on a 25 lb vehicle with less than 1 hp and a top non-coasting speed of 25 mph should be expected to adhere to the same rules as a multi-ton truck. That's irrational and illogical. Legal != prudent in all cases.
I believe that an experienced rider can make a good judgement call that will minimize the risk to himself and others as it relates to the following/breaking of traffic laws. Now, as for my experience the other night, the fact that a majority of them put themselves and others at risk leads me to believe that they were not experienced and therefore probably had no business riding like that at night.
Again, not all rides are like the one I witnessed. I pass one all the time (about 30-40 riders) driving to my in-laws that is very organized and blends with the road traffic very well.