Pawpaw wrote:03Lightningrocks wrote:rp_photo wrote:On a more serious note, this serves to illustrate that long gun open carry is legal in theory only, as several "catch-all" charges like disturbing the peace and soliciting without a permit can easily be made.
It also goes to show that people are not capable of utilizing common sense when not regulated by law. Sad state of affairs actually. There was a time when intelligence ruled the way. Not with these clowns.
I'm just curious, do you feel that way about all constitutionally guaranteed rights, or only some of them?
Any of them that are abused to the point of no longer being a right but instead an infringement of my rights. Get it? Do you really believe all constitutional rights are pure as the driven snow? How about porn? How would you like to explain to your grand children the nature of human sexuality after they just saw a woman strutting naked through the mall? How about we exercise our right to put up billboards with objectionable language? Who gets to determine the difference between objectionable and acceptable.
Go ahead! Exercise your right to free speech and cuss me out on this forum. You can't. Because the moderators of the forum dictate what amount of free speech we may have.
So I am going to go with you are only for the constitutional rights as long as they are in your idea of acceptable?
![Wink ;-)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)