Yeah. You kind of cropped out my statement when you reposted it. Let me fix that for you.PriestTheRunner wrote: ↑Thu Jan 12, 2023 9:47 amJust want to point out, If he was put on a 250,000 bond (which is absolutely unreasonable but not abnormal in our current times), he would have to come up with 25,000 to get out on bond.03Lightningrocks wrote: ↑Thu Jan 12, 2023 7:41 am... the cops would have arrested him "just in case" so they can protect their jobs. Sure he would have been able to get right out on bond ...
I don't know about any of yall, but I couldn't do that right now.
Getting out on bond, and even getting arrested at all, is a MAJOR life and financial headache and too many cops do choose to arrest "just in case" which needs to be severely struck down by the courts (but wont be).
Also, unreasonable bond at the constitution's writing certainly would not have been as high as 3 to 5 years worth of salary in that day and age, just saying.
"the cops would have arrested him "just in case" so they can protect their jobs. Sure he would have been able to get right out on bond but not everybody has the money for an attorney in situations"
But yes, that was my point as well. Hopefully his attorney can keep them from doing him like that.