Reports are saying a dispute between two people. One we know is a "homeboy", the other we don't know for sure yet because they refuse to say his race. Which means it is also a "homeboy". They are not saying gang related yet. Maybe they were in two different gangs but it is hard to know when the "woke" media of Austin is more concerned with confirming stereo types we all know are true rather than telling the actual story. I am betting it is over "disrespect", which we all know is a big thing with the "home boy" crowd.K.Mooneyham wrote: ↑Sun Jun 13, 2021 12:54 amWhat difference does it make if it was a biker gang? Last time I checked, those are still GANGS, and they are still part of the overall violence problem.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Mass shooting in Austin, Texas, leaves at least 13 wounded”
- Sun Jun 13, 2021 3:49 am
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Mass shooting in Austin, Texas, leaves at least 13 wounded
- Replies: 14
- Views: 5233
Re: Mass shooting in Austin, Texas, leaves at least 13 wounded
- Sat Jun 12, 2021 10:30 am
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Mass shooting in Austin, Texas, leaves at least 13 wounded
- Replies: 14
- Views: 5233
Re: Mass shooting in Austin, Texas, leaves at least 13 wounded
K.Mooneyham wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2021 10:18 am Well, I read the story at the link, and was vindicated by doing so. Why? My first thought was gang-related shooting, and near the bottom of the article it says the gang task force was investigating, along with homicide officers. If it was one of those crazy, psychotropic med, "lone wolf" guys (who usually off themselves after the incident), there would be no need for a gang task force to be involved. Now the primary question is "who disrespected who"?
