TexasCHLforum.com

Russell wrote:

edmart001 wrote: It is not my place to judge

When you were between the ages of 16 and 18, did you make all the right adult decisions?

Not many 16 year old's do. I know I didn't. I was only thinking about one thing when I was that age.

I wouldn't judge his character based on that.

I actually agree with you. In fact, in my previous post, I even said, "It is not my place to judge".

And, for the record, I'm not particularly proud of everything I did between the ages of 16 and 18 and I don't think I'm probably the only one.

However, I do think that decision making is a result of character and I also think that if character is in question, the track record of decision making should be considered.

Just my $0.02.

I rarely post, but do read this forum often. I find this case very interesting, agree we don't have all the info, agree there's a difference between what's legal and what's right and it is my OPINION that, based on what has been reported, the CHL shouldn't have done what he did and that I would not have done what he did.

I am also struck by a point that I haven't noticed anyone pick up. That is apparently the CHL holder is 25 and a parent of a 7 or 8 year old. This means he had to have fathered the child at the ripe old age of between 16 and 18. It is not my place to judge, but knowing this does make me want to know more about this person's track record of making adult decisions as well as more detail about what happened on the day.