Then this bill would be better than bush's executive order since it said no NPS buildings.Locksmith wrote:I believe the way it works is: If there is no law saying you that "CAN NOT DO IT"... Then you can do it.This says they cannot prohibit in a NPS unit. Does this mean I can also carry inside a building in the park if the state says its ok to?
Search found 2 matches
Return to “National Park Carry Bill Passed”
- Thu May 21, 2009 8:58 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: National Park Carry Bill Passed
- Replies: 32
- Views: 4501
Re: National Park Carry Bill Passed
- Thu May 21, 2009 5:01 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: National Park Carry Bill Passed
- Replies: 32
- Views: 4501
Re: National Park Carry Bill Passed
(b) PROTECTING THE RIGHT OF INDIVIDUALS TO BEAR ARMS IN UNITS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM AND THE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM.—The Secretary of the Interior shall not promulgate or enforce any
regulation that prohibits an individual from possessing a firearm including an assembled or functional firearm in any unit of the National Park System or the National Wildlife Refuge System if—
(1) the individual is not otherwise prohibited by law from possessing the firearm; and
(2) the possession of the firearm is in compliance with the law of the State in which the unit of the National Park System or the National Wildlife Refuge System is located.
This says they cannot prohibit in a NPS unit. Does this mean I can also carry inside a building in the park if the state says its ok to?