TexasCHLforum.com

Now that I finally "get' the 30.06 situation, I think I know where these pro-unlicensed carry people are coming from.

A few years ago the federal government stuck it's nose in a private medical family matter and the "pro intervention' people screamed about a fictitious murder plot, and how the government was trying to save this woman's life, and on and on. They were so fixated on getting their way, they didn't realize that inviting the same forces that would "save" her, could be perverted and now intrude our lives daily. They rail on about how the current WH occupant is "trashing" the Constitution, when back then, a State Supreme Court voted unanimously that the Executive branch of that state was acting outside the law. Then the Supreme Court told the Feds to butt-out, it's none of your business. How many stories have we seen about privacy and the lack of it these days? Meanwhile, between Facebook, Twitter, and who knows how many other 'social' media programs, everything is out there for the world to see!

These guys that think the 2A is their license to carry, They are trying to get their way so bad, they are failing to see the damage they are doing to all 2A supporters -- licensed, concealed, or no.

I'm far from confident any serious pro 2A legislation will get passed this session. Charles is already looking two years down the road. Well, how many more two year sessions do we have left? We have arguably the most conservative legislature in Texas history, and it's all about to be tossed away because the die-hard open carriers are acting foolishly.

Seriously? You want to throw away good legislation over the difference between a belt holster and an ankle holster? By the way, good luck getting to that ankle holster when precious seconds count and your weapon is down at your feet.