Good grief! Firstly, I don't go into 51% joints. I can't stand the smoke OR the cost of alcohol by the drink. Secondly, It's my business where and how I carry because 'concealed is concealed'. I know where I can and shan't carry legally and the consequences of error. Some of you guys need to get a life and quit playing like you're the "CHL police" and interpreter of the rules.TexasCajun wrote:Until the statute in question is found to be unlawful or unconstitutional, violating said law makes you a criminal by definition. And advocating disregarding a law that we disagree with is still advocating breaking the law - which is a violation of this forum's rules.gringo pistolero wrote:I disagree. If a statute violates the constitution it is by definition unconstitutional. The unlawful statute is no law.txnative1951 wrote:As they say, there's "legal" and there's "moral" -- sometimes they even coincide. Some will say that violating a "law" that is an obvious infringement of their 2nd Amendment rights is the moral thing to do.
If 'concealed means concealed' was in reference to carrying in an establishment that has posted the incorrect TABC signage, then I agree. Don't make a fuss about it & go on about your business. But if that statement was in regard to disobeying whatever law you happen to disagree with, I think you ate going to eventually have a very hard go of it.
Actually, if one has been to a half-way decent CHL class, it may be like my dear mother often told me, "...if you have to ask, you already know the answer...".
Dang, I miss her.....
Can you clarify for me, then? 