Ameer wrote:A cell phone is not a Bat Signal.Oldgringo wrote:Ladies and gentlemen do not text and drive.
![Smile5 :smilelol5:](./images/smilies/smilielol5.gif)
![rlol "rlol"](./images/smilies/rlol.gif)
Return to “The "Utah Problem" is back in uglier clothing”
Ameer wrote:A cell phone is not a Bat Signal.Oldgringo wrote:Ladies and gentlemen do not text and drive.
Ladies and gentlemen do not text and drive.03Lightningrocks wrote:LOL... splitting hairs does not mean texting while driving is not an issue. Is 28% confirmed enough for you? How many folks lied about it when questioned by police. The lady who hit me lied about it. I watched her texting as she hit me and she claimed she wasn't.Keith B wrote:That is not most of the accidents. They are caused by negligence and inatentaiveness, but not nessicarily by cell phone or texting.03Lightningrocks wrote:Just one of thousands. Google is your friend.Crossfire wrote:You have the facts to backup that claim? I am very doubtful that MOST accidents are caused by cell phone use - whether talking, texting, or whatever.03Lightningrocks wrote:Negligence behind the wheel laws do nothing about the FACT that most accidents are caused by ignorant, inconsiderate fools, texting or talking on cell phones while driving. I suppose we should get rid of drinking while driving laws too. Maybe speed limit rules are completely wrong. We should be allowed to drive as fast as we want, as long as we are not being reckless.
Driving is not a right! It is a privilege. It should be regulated by the state to insure we have safe highways.![]()
http://www.accidentinfo.com/blog/when-y ... -accident/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;