Ok, I'll bite. How does having a license from another state solve the problem? You still have to follow Texas laws in Texas.bigtek wrote:I recommend people read this forum to learn the law and then get a license from another state because Texas DPS either doesn't know the law or they intentionally break the law. Either way, it's best to avoid their fudge cluster.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “"Gun-Buster" Sign Legal?”
- Tue Dec 26, 2017 3:31 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: "Gun-Buster" Sign Legal?
- Replies: 81
- Views: 25009
Re: "Gun-Buster" Sign Legal?
- Fri Dec 22, 2017 6:55 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: "Gun-Buster" Sign Legal?
- Replies: 81
- Views: 25009
Re: "Gun-Buster" Sign Legal?
As they said in the January 2016 class. One instructor even stated that he knew a case where an individual was convicted for violating an invalid sign. No details of course.Vol Texan wrote:I just finished up the New LTC Instructor course today. I can tell you first hand that what Keith said is exactly what we were told - and this was reinforced by multiple instructors.twomillenium wrote:I do not know who told Keith B this, but I have not experienced any such notification from the DPS.mojo84 wrote:If this is accurate, it's very disappointing. It's even worse than an individual officer making up his own laws and interpretations. It needs to be addressed.Keith B wrote:
It will not do any good. DPS tells instructors that any 'no guns' sign is notification, legal or not, so they will not take action on an instructor teaching this.
They told us in no uncertain terms that (a) gunbuster signs, (b) “No Guns” signs, and (c) a sign containing only the term “30.06” (with no other accompanying verbiage) all demonstrate the property owner’s intent, so therefore all have the force of law.
This problem needs to be solved at DPS first.