TexasCHLforum.com

lawrnk wrote:I'll put obama for my second choice when its down to him and the unabomber

amber wrote:

mr surveyor wrote:it might be best to just let it go. I don't think that "calling out" someone for confrontation is the proper way to handle the situation. I still believe that the old adage of "never have a battle of wits with the unarmed" fits this case well.

That's why I haven't bothered to reply to those people. The way some of them are trying to pick a fight I don't think the were paying attention when they took the CHL class. If they took the CHL class.

DParker wrote:

lunchbox wrote:so is part of marshal law taking away gun rights?????????

Who's this Marshal Law guy?

anygunanywhere wrote:

Tactical_Texan_CHL wrote: But to be totally honest, I find her presence here very unsettling, and I'm not really comfortable with her.

If I could actually put into words what went through my head when I read her first post and saw that nasty mug of BHO on her sig line....definitely not 10 year old daughter material.

Being right of center, even extreme is not required for hanging out here but it helps. We have members who are democrats, and I can accept the old Zell MIller democrats that the lefties abandoned. They vote pro-2A. I am sympatghetic to them because the GOP has abandoned me and gone left.

What bothers me the most about Amber's type is that they espouse rights and freedom, but want to take mine away.

They must learn that where my rights begin, theirs end. The lesson needs to be painful.

Anygunanywhere

Tactical_Texan_CHL wrote:I suppose you're right, anygun. But to be totally honest, I find her presence here very unsettling, and I'm not really comfortable with her. Amber, if you read this and you're offended, I appologize. But until you show me otherwise, I'm still a little untrusting of your intent here, as I'm positive others are as well.