I'd be happy with the 5 points. Kids can learn to shoot using rifles but can't control handguns very well due to their motor skills still developing - at least to a certain age (12 or so, I would guess).The Annoyed Man wrote:Interestingly, when you look at Texas' score, we score a 9 (http://www.bradycampaign.org/stategunlaws/scorecard/TX/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;), meaning there are at least a few things we do that they agree with. That begs the question: If the Brady Bunch is the standard by which we judge gun grabbers, then shouldn't a perfect record on the RKBA earn you a 0; or, is it a case that even a broken clock is right once every 12 hours?
According to the Brady Campaign, we earned those 9 points for:
A) Restricting access to handguns for children under the ages of 16/17 - 5 out of 5 possible points;
B) Employers not forced to allow firearms on premises - 2 out of 2 possible points;
C) Colleges are not forced to allow firearms on campus - 2 out of 2 possible points.
What do you all think? Would a 0 have been better than a 9?
I guess this is where my social conditioning is getting to me. If we all have a 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms, I don't believe that right has an inherent age limit. However, my social conditioning is having me say "What do kids need access to handguns for? Kids don't need to carry guns!"