John Kerry now says that Scott Brown's rallys are "reminiscent of the dangerous atmosphere of Sarah Palin’s 2008 campaign rallies".
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/? ... FhYzhiODE=
Search found 2 matches
- Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:42 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: GO SCOTT BROWN>
- Replies: 61
- Views: 8234
- Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:01 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: GO SCOTT BROWN>
- Replies: 61
- Views: 8234
Re: GO SCOTT BROWN>
Polls yesterday show Brown up by 9 points.
Now you have Barney Frank wanting to change the filibuster rules because they're afraid they'll lose this seat (http://www.breitbart.tv/barney-frank-go ... ilibuster/)
You have an MSNBC pundit on his radio show advocating voter fraud and cheating to keep Republicans from winning elections (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OB3j9fpTKkk)
In 2004, when Romney was Governor of Mass. and Kerry was running against Bush, the Dems there passed a law stating the Governor couldn't appoint a Senator to a vacant Senate seat. This was because they feared Romney would appoint a Republican to replace Kerry if Kerry won against Bush.
In 2009, with a Democrat Governor, and Kennedy in poor health, the Democrats again changed the law to allow the Governor to appoint a Senator to a vacant Senate seat. This was because they feared not having enough votes to pass health care upon Kennedy's death with a vacant Senate seat.
Now they're talking about changing Senate filibuster rules if they lose their 60 vote supermajority.
Now, I'm not a lawyer, I don't play one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, but I can smell when something's fishy and one party will do anything in its power to stay in power, irregardless of the will of the People.
Now you have Barney Frank wanting to change the filibuster rules because they're afraid they'll lose this seat (http://www.breitbart.tv/barney-frank-go ... ilibuster/)
You have an MSNBC pundit on his radio show advocating voter fraud and cheating to keep Republicans from winning elections (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OB3j9fpTKkk)
In 2004, when Romney was Governor of Mass. and Kerry was running against Bush, the Dems there passed a law stating the Governor couldn't appoint a Senator to a vacant Senate seat. This was because they feared Romney would appoint a Republican to replace Kerry if Kerry won against Bush.
In 2009, with a Democrat Governor, and Kennedy in poor health, the Democrats again changed the law to allow the Governor to appoint a Senator to a vacant Senate seat. This was because they feared not having enough votes to pass health care upon Kennedy's death with a vacant Senate seat.
Now they're talking about changing Senate filibuster rules if they lose their 60 vote supermajority.
Now, I'm not a lawyer, I don't play one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, but I can smell when something's fishy and one party will do anything in its power to stay in power, irregardless of the will of the People.