Search found 4 matches

by kman458
Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:13 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: TX DPS Sancktioned well-regulated Militias?
Replies: 35
Views: 4648

Re: TX DPS Sancktioned well-regulated Militias?

G26ster wrote:The term United States Army has changed over time. Here is a quote from wikipedia, which I believe to be true:

"Currently, the army is divided into the Regular Army, the Army Reserve, and the Army National Guard. The army is also divided into major branches such as Air Defense Artillery, Infantry, Aviation, Signal Corps, Corps of Engineers, and Armor. Before 1903 members of the National Guard were considered state soldiers unless federalized (i.e., activated) by the President. Since the Militia Act of 1903 all National Guard soldiers have held dual status: as National Guardsmen under the authority of the governor of their state or territory and, when activated, as a reserve of the U.S. Army under the authority of the President."
I have read a couple places that described it a little different.
1) Army or just military
2) organized militia ie U.S. and state national guard and reserves.
3) unorganized militia or sometimes called the reserve militia that consists of everyone not included in above 2. I have also seen where the reserve militia can be equipped with as many guns as they can afford to buy. I will have to go hunt down where I read this at as I can not remember where at this time but it seems to me that it was describing the definition of militia from the militia act of 1902.
by kman458
Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:51 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: TX DPS Sancktioned well-regulated Militias?
Replies: 35
Views: 4648

Re: TX DPS Sancktioned well-regulated Militias?

The Annoyed Man wrote:
kman458 wrote:Read USC title 10 section 311
The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied
males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section
313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a
declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States
and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the
National Guard.
Here's the problem, and this just my feelings in the matter and I realize that it has no weight of law: I am 60 years old, and I am not entirely able-bodied. So by the above definition, I am no longer a part of the militia; and that breaks my heart because in my mind and my heart, I am very much part of it. I may not be able to run with a carbine and keep up with the young folks, but I have useful skills....not the least of which is being patient with young folks. And I can shoot, and teach others to shoot, but my heavy lifting days are behind me. I find myself at that "old dog" stage of life where the spirit is willing, but the body no longer is, and it is hard to give that up. I don't want to be "just another old man in the rear." If anything, I am more committed today to my love of country than at any other time previously. It bothers me that the U.S. code discriminates against me because of my age, and it bothers me that my age makes me less useful to my country.
I agree totally with what you are saying. I am 54 and feel the same way myself at times. Too young to die and too old to be of any use does sux.
by kman458
Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:48 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: TX DPS Sancktioned well-regulated Militias?
Replies: 35
Views: 4648

Re: TX DPS Sancktioned well-regulated Militias?

RoyGBiv wrote:
kman458 wrote:Read USC title 10 section 311

Also Texas Government Code chapter 431
Subchapter A 431.000, 431.010
Subchapter D 431.051
Subchapter F 431.081
When you cite stuff like that, it's polite to provide links
http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/10C13.txt" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/D ... GV.431.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

TX could redefine the "Texas Militia" in it's own way by rule of law.
In fact, TX could choose to add an entire new class (see Sec. 431.001) to accomplish the job.

None of this is insurmountable for a determined legislature.

Seems to me to be a rather creative way to flout a Federal ban. Not sure it would stick, but, arresting Federal officers won't stick either and States are working to pass those laws.. Just to make a point.
You are right about the links and sorry about that and I normally would but I just got an iPad and are still figuring out how this thing works.
by kman458
Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:45 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: TX DPS Sancktioned well-regulated Militias?
Replies: 35
Views: 4648

Re: TX DPS Sancktioned well-regulated Militias?

Read USC title 10 section 311

Also Texas Government Code chapter 431
Subchapter A 431.000, 431.010
Subchapter D 431.051
Subchapter F 431.081

Return to “TX DPS Sancktioned well-regulated Militias?”