TexasCHLforum.com

They said the same stuff about CC in the mid-90s. "There will be blood in the streets, simple disagreements will turn in to gun battles, we will have to hire more officers to handle the additional call volume... and more Coroners and MEs on top of that.........."

None of it ever happened. When will they learn, they cannot scare us into giving up our God-given rights?

So, we have a bill with identical language that just passed both houses.... so we go to Governor's desk... right?!?!?

Slowest copy machine..... EVER!!!

Nevermind... this guy is going to spill the beans for us.

Based on what so many have said about how the SCOTUS interprets the 4A, and how this SHOULD apply to a person who is OCing, and as it has been explained to me, there does not seem to be a need for this amendment that prevents a cop from stopping you simply because they are OCing.

Would it be so hard for someone to say "This isn't needed because according to the 4A an officer cannot legally do this without PC anyway"? or would that pretty much kill the whole thing based on that fact, and everyone else knows it and is just keeping quiet?

By the way, I now see why the Dutton had to be pulled to get it past Huffman in the SA Committee.