that's easy, overzealous DA... not to mention that the majority of these folks who were wrongly convicted are black, and that none were up for capital crimes, and those aforementioned safeguards were not then used. also, in many of those cases, the person admitted to wrong doing, and even plead guilty (Possibly they were guilty of other, equally serious crimes)atxgun wrote:How many times do you read in the news about somebody that's been locked up for the majority of their life being freed based off DNA evidence that wasn't available at the time of their conviction?AJSully421 wrote: But really, I am very ok with the death penalty simply because it is reserved for those who have taken a life in a merciless way, and there are so many safeguards to make sure we have the right guy.
That's not to imply I disagree with the death penalty, just something to think about.
AFAIK, there has been only one Texas execution that has been later seriously questioned... Cantu 1993 (And even in that one, a gang member was the prime witness, and now says he lied on the stand... well, i don't believe ANYTHING that a gang member says)
I don't have a problem with the state killing people... it's an example to the others, and it even keeps my mind on making sure i am engaging in a clean SD shoot.