Search found 2 matches

by Charles L. Cotton
Mon Apr 16, 2018 3:49 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Calaveras and Braunig Lakes
Replies: 33
Views: 13503

Re: Calaveras and Braunig Lakes

BBYC wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:
G.A. Heath wrote:
crazy2medic wrote:If my understanding of the 30.06 signs is correct, the prohibits you from entering a build or portion of a building, so as long as you don't enter any buildings it should be legal to carry.
Wrong, 30.06 and 30.07 use the term property, not premises.
Also, the narrow definition of "premises" applies to TPC §§46.03 and 46.035, not Chapter 30.

A good argument could be made that a 30.06 sign on a building renders the building off-limits, not the entire property.

Chas.
I agree if the building is open to the public. However, if the signs are posted on a ticket booth at the entrance wher you pay admission, I think a reasonable man would conclude it applies to the property for which you pay admission. The same principle would seem to apply to a park, amusement park, privately owned zoo, etc.
:iagree:
Chas.
by Charles L. Cotton
Mon Apr 16, 2018 10:47 am
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Calaveras and Braunig Lakes
Replies: 33
Views: 13503

Re: Calaveras and Braunig Lakes

G.A. Heath wrote:
crazy2medic wrote:If my understanding of the 30.06 signs is correct, the prohibits you from entering a build or portion of a building, so as long as you don't enter any buildings it should be legal to carry.
Wrong, 30.06 and 30.07 use the term property, not premises.
Also, the narrow definition of "premises" applies to TPC §§46.03 and 46.035, not Chapter 30.

A good argument could be made that a 30.06 sign on a building renders the building off-limits, not the entire property.

Chas.

Return to “Calaveras and Braunig Lakes”