Search found 2 matches

by Charles L. Cotton
Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:55 am
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Electoral college 2016 status Trump 304 v Clinton 163
Replies: 106
Views: 18584

Re: Electoral college 2016 status Trump 268 v Clinton 160

Skiprr wrote:
Keith B wrote:
E.Marquez wrote:
But who were the two faithless electors? I assume one was Christopher Suprun ..who was the other?
Sisneros was the vote for Ron Paul. The other vote was by Suprun for Kasich
Doesn't seem so. Art Sisneros was one of four Texas electors who resigned prior to the vote; he was replaced by Janis Holt. Still seems our Ron Paul voter is a mystery. Not that it matters much right now. But that person should never serve as an elector again. IMHO.

After the vote, Governor Abbott tweeted: "This charade is over. A bill is already filed to make these commitments binding. I look forward to signing it & ending this circus."
Good. The only way to enforce it is to make secret ballots unlawful. There's no reason for a secret vote when you are supposed to be representing the will of the voters.

Chas.
by Charles L. Cotton
Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:29 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Electoral college 2016 status Trump 304 v Clinton 163
Replies: 106
Views: 18584

Re: Electoral college 2016 status Trump 268 v Clinton 160

Two dirtbags voted for someone other than the people's choice. One voted for Ron Paul and I couldn't hear the other vote.

Chas.

Return to “Electoral college 2016 status Trump 304 v Clinton 163”