TexasCHLforum.com

jrs_diesel wrote:Is it me, or do I not see any clear answers about the 30.06 and 30.07 signs, and what they consider off limits establishments?

It's very clear to me. He is saying, if you're legal, you are covered. Apparently, you are covered without limits, including expert witnesses and a lot more than just a "free" attorney.

Chas.

Countryside wrote:I did not know the stating of the name of the company was improper.

It's not improper and I guess I'm going a bit overboard trying to be fair. I won't let people promote another pre-paid legal service and I don't want to be accused of allowing some to be named and not another.

Chas.

I'm not sure why you mentioned the company's name, but my answer would be the same with or without it.

It's clear to me that if you are in legal possession of your firearm, then you are covered by their "policy" to whatever extent any coverage is offered. If I were representing the company and received your emails, I would be even more vague in my response. They don't know you from Adam and with Bloomberg goons jumping on opportunities to blast gown owners and companies dealing with gun owners, they are probably a concerned.

This is probably well known by now, but I'm not endorsing this or any pre-paid legal company!! Read the contract and know what you are getting and not getting. Check also to see if there are any lawsuits against the company you are considering.

Chas.