Search found 3 matches

by Charles L. Cotton
Thu Apr 30, 2015 9:24 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Discharged "under honorable conditions" = not "honorably"
Replies: 193
Views: 51992

Re: Discharged "under honorable conditions" = not "honorably

Right2Carry wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:The discount as well as the eligibility and controlling definitions are in the Government Code and are not set by DPS.

I'm going to Austin Tuesday to testify on one of Sen. Huffman's bills; I'll ask Sen. Campbell about this thread and what has been said about her involvement.

Loren, if you "have no interest in any other threads on this forum[,]" then do you want me to deactivate your registration?

Chas.
Tex. Gov't Code §411.1951 wrote:Sec. 411.1951. WAIVER OR REDUCTION OF FEES FOR MEMBERS OR VETERANS OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES. (a) In this section, "veteran" means a person who:
(1) has served in:
(A) the army, navy, air force, coast guard, or marine corps of the United States;
(B) the Texas military forces as defined by Section 437.001; or
(C) an auxiliary service of one of those branches of the armed forces; and
(2) has been honorably discharged from the branch of the service in which the person served.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, the department shall waive any fee required for the issuance of an original, duplicate, modified, or renewed license under this subchapter if the applicant for the license is:
(1) a member of the United States armed forces, including a member of the reserves, national guard, or state guard; or
(2) a veteran who, within 365 days preceding the date of the application, was honorably discharged from the branch of service in which the person served.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, if the applicant is a veteran who, more than 365 days preceding the date of the application, was honorably discharged from the branch of the service in which the applicant served:
(1) the applicant must pay a fee of $25 for the issuance of an original or renewed license under this subchapter; and
(2) the department shall reduce by 50 percent any fee required of the applicant for a duplicate or modified license under this subchapter.
Any update?
I didn't talk to Sen. Campbell. When they came off the floor late, we went right into committee hearings and I didn't have the opportunity to talk to her before I left for home.

Chas.
by Charles L. Cotton
Mon Apr 27, 2015 7:23 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Discharged "under honorable conditions" = not "honorably"
Replies: 193
Views: 51992

Re: Discharged "under honorable conditions" = not "honorably

loren wrote:Has anyone noticed unexplained deletions of postings in any thread at this forum?
Please send me a private email if you have. What I've noticed was probably just a "glitch" but if it seems to be happening somehow it should be reported.

Could be even my imagination or operator error but I edited the first post of this thread and part of that edit is shown but a paragraph is missing. Strange.

Thanks.
Regarding your so-called second "edit," it was deleted from your original post. It wasn't an "edit," or an update. You grossly characterized 10 pages of posts by Forum Members because you didn't like what was said. You don't get to control, edit, or summarize the posts of other Members. I'm also not at all pleased with your insinuation about disappearing posts. The Forum wasn't created just to provide you a place to complain about the DPS. Since you're not interested in anything other than this now exhausted thread, I trust you're through posting.

Chas.
by Charles L. Cotton
Sun Apr 26, 2015 9:50 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Discharged "under honorable conditions" = not "honorably"
Replies: 193
Views: 51992

Re: Discharged "under honorable conditions" = not "honorably

The discount as well as the eligibility and controlling definitions are in the Government Code and are not set by DPS.

I'm going to Austin Tuesday to testify on one of Sen. Huffman's bills; I'll ask Sen. Campbell about this thread and what has been said about her involvement.

Loren, if you "have no interest in any other threads on this forum[,]" then do you want me to deactivate your registration?

Chas.
Tex. Gov't Code §411.1951 wrote:Sec. 411.1951. WAIVER OR REDUCTION OF FEES FOR MEMBERS OR VETERANS OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES. (a) In this section, "veteran" means a person who:
(1) has served in:
(A) the army, navy, air force, coast guard, or marine corps of the United States;
(B) the Texas military forces as defined by Section 437.001; or
(C) an auxiliary service of one of those branches of the armed forces; and
(2) has been honorably discharged from the branch of the service in which the person served.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, the department shall waive any fee required for the issuance of an original, duplicate, modified, or renewed license under this subchapter if the applicant for the license is:
(1) a member of the United States armed forces, including a member of the reserves, national guard, or state guard; or
(2) a veteran who, within 365 days preceding the date of the application, was honorably discharged from the branch of service in which the person served.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, if the applicant is a veteran who, more than 365 days preceding the date of the application, was honorably discharged from the branch of the service in which the applicant served:
(1) the applicant must pay a fee of $25 for the issuance of an original or renewed license under this subchapter; and
(2) the department shall reduce by 50 percent any fee required of the applicant for a duplicate or modified license under this subchapter.

Return to “Discharged "under honorable conditions" = not "honorably"”