TexasCHLforum.com

The Annoyed Man wrote:

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

Jumping Frog wrote:

Charles L. Cotton wrote:Yes, this could get very interesting.

Especially if PC §46.035(c) and (i) get brought into play . . .

I'm waiting to see if the Senate gallery or floor has a 30.06 sign. That would cause quite a political stir, as it did several sessions ago when someone decided to post them on both the Senate and House entrances.

Chas.

Charles, was it posted with intent to enforce, or was it just a political stunt and someone was trying to make appoint?

I don't recall any troopers guarding the entrances, but the signs were huge! The intent was to keep guns out of the galleries. If I recall correctly, they were there for only one session, two at the most. It was a political hot potato and the signs never went back up. Watkins may change that for this hearing.

Chas.

Jumping Frog wrote:

Charles L. Cotton wrote:Yes, this could get very interesting.

Especially if PC §46.035(c) and (i) get brought into play . . .

I'm waiting to see if the Senate gallery or floor has a 30.06 sign. That would cause quite a political stir, as it did several sessions ago when someone decided to post them on both the Senate and House entrances.

Chas.

Bladed wrote:This should be interesting: " onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

It seems that Come and Take It Texas plans on showing up at the committee hearing wearing outside-the-waistband holsters covered with socks with pictures of guns on them (click on the link to see what I mean).

Yes, this could get very interesting.

Chas.