Search found 2 matches

by Charles L. Cotton
Thu Jan 29, 2015 10:39 am
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired
Replies: 85
Views: 12259

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

Cedar Park Dad wrote:
Jumping Frog wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:I don't know what the civil law is there, but if this were in Texas and if she had a contract with Fox, I'd be filing a suit for tortuous interference with contractual relationship. Get an injunction, attorney fees and perhaps other remedies.

Chas.
How? They are using free speech. I don't agree with it, but thats kind of the point of the Big 2A, to protect the rights of others to say what we don't like and admit how stupid they are. ;-)
Tortious interference is attempting to interfere in the contractual relationship existing between two other parties.

Sure, they have free speech, but that neither justifies falsely yelling fire in a movie theater nor interfering in someone's contract.
Which they are doing neither. Good luck with making that claim in court.
First Amendment protects people from government, not other citizens bringing recognized claims. Your Second Amendment rights don't force me to allow you into my home with your gun.

As I said, I don't know D.C. law, but it would be a viable claim in Texas.

Chas.
by Charles L. Cotton
Wed Jan 28, 2015 12:01 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired
Replies: 85
Views: 12259

Re: CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired

I don't know what the civil law is there, but if this were in Texas and if she had a contract with Fox, I'd be filing a suit for tortuous interference with contractual relationship. Get an injunction, attorney fees and perhaps other remedies.

Chas.

Return to “CSGV campaigns to have Emily Miller fired”