This thread was started in the Legislative - Federal section, even though it has nothing to do with legislation. I tried to find a place where it would fit, but it doesn't. It's clearly political, so I moved it to the Political section, but it doesn't work here either. Due to people wanting to post every type of hot button political subject matter imaginable, the rule was changed such that As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.
This thread is locked.
Chas.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Republicans Against The Tea Party: Part Deux”
- Sun Jul 27, 2014 4:38 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Republicans Against The Tea Party: Part Deux
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1589
- Sun Jul 27, 2014 1:34 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Republicans Against The Tea Party: Part Deux
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1589
Re: Republicans Against The Tea Party: Part Deux
Yes it is!! How about I write an article about all Tea Party candidates and supporters having ties to the Mexican drug cartels. Does that article stand on its own until you prove otherwise?EEllis wrote:So you beat your wife until you can prove otherwise? That's an absurd statement. Does he also have to prove that the moon landings were real because I saw an article on the internet the other day that swore they were fake.Right2Carry wrote:Actually it looks like you can't prove it didn't come from Cornyn or his PAC. The article stands on its own until you can prove otherwise.mojo84 wrote:So you are OK with your disdain clouding your judgment? Like I said, the support and data provided does not support your assertion that the money came from Cornyn or "Cornyn's PAC". Him being a " rino" doesn't prove your point either.bi wasn't looking for "loopholes" was just trying to verify what the article and you were saying and I couldn't.
I don't think you can prove it was Cornyn or "Cornyn's PAC" because if you could, you would have.
Hopefully others don't just assume what they read on the interwebs as being true.
Chas.