If he held himself out as an officer, then he has a problem. However, the report contains information that indicates the badge he was wearing was believed to be proof of having a CHL. Here's the relevant part: "AND HAS WAS LOOKS LIKE A PERMIT TO CARRY DISPLAYED ON CHAIN." It's clear from this quote the the badge was not believed to be a LEO badge.texanjoker wrote:Charles,
that is merely a CAD entry and not a police report. (CAD computer aided dispatch). Based on the limited article this guy allegedly ID himself as an undercover officer. IF he did that the arrest is good.
I certainly don't see any basis for TPC §46.035(a) [concealment] arrest or charges. The "intentional" conduct requirement is a big problem for LEOs and prosecutors, just as was intended.
I truly believe that had this guy not had the CHL badge, no call or arrest would have occurred.
Chas.