This discussion is not going to continue with racial allegations and quasi-personal attacks.drjoker wrote:What evidence is allowable or not is decided by... the judge! What testimony is allowable or not is decided by... the judge! What assertions are allowable or overruled are decided by... the judge! Hmmm... I wonder if you can get a fair trial if the judge put blinders on the jury?b322da wrote:It was just a matter of time until this brilliant observation surfaced here. Since when did the judge convict the murderer? The jury convicted him. I would suggest that if there is anyone out there who knows what the relevant evidence was better than even you do, it was the jury.drjoker wrote:The fact of the matter is that the kid was black and the judge was up for re-election in a black district.The Annoyed Man wrote:to pump 4 or 5 rounds into the guy who is already down and immobile.
I hate to question your judgment again, TAM, but I must once again agree with you.
Elmo
The judge presiding his trial is under investigation for fraud: http://public.esquireempire.com/Hon.+Ju ... e+Oklahoma . She is defending herself in court against allegations that she stole state funds meant for foster children.
Judge Tammy Bass LeSure is a flaming liberal who is a known anti-2nd amendment activist.
You still think it was a fair trail? When you're forced to defend yourself with a gun, we'll make sure that she's YOUR judge. Is that O.K.?
They later changed judges in mid-trial, but not until after damaging testimony that should have been overruled was already presented.
Since the passage of the CHL laws in many states, the liberal anti-2nd amendment activists who know they cannot influence the ballot box have switched from influencing the ballot boxes to rigging trials and railroading good citizens in favor of thugs, greasy politicians and their cronies. Under this onslaught, we must exhibit solidarity and stick together. TAM, if there is a protest in Oklahoma for Jerome Ersland, I'll drive us there and pay for all the gas.
Chas.