TexasCHLforum.com

Steven420 wrote:I wasn't playing the victim, I asked for clarification and got none. No PM, nothing.
So yeah remove me like I asked.
I no longer wish to be associated with you people.
Good day.

"Nazi," "no longer want to be associated with you people" don't look like comments asking for "clarification." You didn't want clarification, you wanted to complain. If you really didn't have a clue as to what you did wrong and truly wanted to know, then even a quick review of the rules would have given you your answer. It's ironic that the attitude you are showing here is the same one that got you the citation. Even in your last post that I edited you had to throw in a profanity.

Bye, you won't be missed!
Chas.

Steven420 wrote:I find it strangely odd that no moderators will fess up to deleting my post. How am I to know what infraction was comitted? Please remove my registration, and username from this Nazi website. I no longer want to be associated with you people.

I explained the issues with your post and the delay in response that you perceive. If you are still upset and want me to delete your registration, I will do so. However, if you are satisfied with the explanation I provided and want to stay, I'll be happy to leave your registration active, but only if 1) you apologize for your blatant violation of the rules of this community; 2) apologize to the Moderators for the "Nazi" comment; and 3) apologize to the 7,000+ members for your childish "I no longer want to be associated with you people" comment. Otherwise, I will be thrilled to remove you from our forum.

It amazes me that some people can blatantly violate a site's rules, then try to play the victim when corrective action is taken by the Moderators.

Chas.

Steven420 wrote:I wasn't bashing anyone.

You most certainly were. Your post didn't merely ask advice on how to defend against a citation given by an off duty officer in his personal vehicle. You went on a tirade against him filled with pejorative terms. That's blatant LEO bashing in violation of Rule 9.

Not only did you violate Rule 9, your reference to "the obligatory point to the crouch" is a clear and unmistakable profanity and a sexual innuendo in violation of Rules 1 and 8.

The thread was moved to the Moderators Forum for discussion to see if it could be edited so that it wouldn't violate the rules and then returned to the open forum. Obviously this wasn't done fast enough for you, but please remember that all of the Moderators are volunteers who have real jobs and family obligations. They handle matters as quickly as they can.

There was a very easy way to avoid this issue however, you could read and follow the rules.

Chas.