It's a term of art that refers to the rights of the people.chabouk wrote:And to be pedantic, states don't have rights, they have authority. People have rights.
Chas.
Return to “Rep. Ron Paul did not sign the Congressional Amicus Brief”
It's a term of art that refers to the rights of the people.chabouk wrote:And to be pedantic, states don't have rights, they have authority. People have rights.
He's mine too and I suspect I know what he will say. To say I'm disappointed is an understatement!FlynJay wrote:Looks like I have to write my representative for his reasons for not signing the brief.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Texas Rep. Ron Paul signed the amicus brief signed by numerous U.S. Senators and Congressmen. However, he did not sign the amicus brief in McDonald v. Chicago that seeks to extend the protections of the Second Amendment to the states. The brief is attached. Do a search for "Ron Paul" and you won't find anything.
Interesting.
Chas.