Part of this post said that there are good points on both sides, Hey, I don't see any good points on the anti-gun side, if all they have are reasons why I shouldn't be carrying my Glock, or even have it, then their point isn't valid, you either have a gun to protect yourself with, or you become a victim, most likely a dead one. And there is no excuse for that.
Brian
-------------------
bdickens wrote:I'd like to ask these idiots who say "more guns aren't the answer" this: Just what, pray tell, is the answer? If more guns isn't, what is? More "gun free zone" signs that advertise the availability of fattened lambs waiting for the slaughter?