Ah. Thanks.der Teufel wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 12:53 pmI think there's "an old saying" that a DA can present whatever evidence to a grand jury they feel appropriate, omitting what doesn't fit their narrative, such that they could indict a ham sandwich of a crime if they desired to do so.The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 12:48 pm Pardon my ignorance, but what is a "ham sandwich indictment"?
Search found 2 matches
Return to “MO: St. Louis Lawyers Defend Mansion From BLM Protesters In Viral Video”
- Wed Oct 07, 2020 12:55 pm
- Forum: Self-Defense Reports
- Topic: MO: St. Louis Lawyers Defend Mansion From BLM Protesters In Viral Video
- Replies: 160
- Views: 71828
Re: MO: St. Louis Lawyers Defend Mansion From BLM Protesters In Viral Video
- Wed Oct 07, 2020 12:48 pm
- Forum: Self-Defense Reports
- Topic: MO: St. Louis Lawyers Defend Mansion From BLM Protesters In Viral Video
- Replies: 160
- Views: 71828
Re: MO: St. Louis Lawyers Defend Mansion From BLM Protesters In Viral Video
Pardon my ignorance, but what is a "ham sandwich indictment"?dlh wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 10:56 amIn my opinion Kim Gardner has indicted the proverbial "ham sandwich." She should have to try the case herself. However, would not surprisertschl wrote: ↑Tue Oct 06, 2020 3:54 pm The couple has been indicted.
A grand jury in St. Louis on Tuesday indicted Mark and Patricia McCloskey on counts of exhibiting a weapon and tampering with evidence four months after footage circulated showing the couple pointing guns at Black Lives Matter protesters outside their home.
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watc ... protesters
me at all if she passes it off to one of her assistants. There was a District Attorney in Texas who kept "ham sandwiches" to a minimum. He told his assistants if you indict a ham sandwich then YOU get to try the ham sandwich--really cut down on the ham sandwich indictments in his district.