TexasCHLforum.com

AndyC wrote: ↑Sat Jun 20, 2020 12:09 pm One thing I don't personally like about the full-size Sig models is that the grip-design positions the hand pretty far below the line of the bore; I can't get high up on it like I can with most other pistols to get better leverage against muzzle-flip.

Normally, I’d agree with that. But my experience of handling (not shooting) a friend's P365XL lent a different impression than that. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

SQLGeek wrote: ↑Mon May 11, 2020 9:31 pm

The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Mon May 11, 2020 9:16 pm

That said, if I were going to buy a NEW Glock, I’d give both the 19x and the 45 a really hard look. And you can get 15 round mags that flush fit the single stack 45.

TAM, the 45 isn't a single stack, it's a double stack 17 frame. Are you thinking of the 43X/48?

Yes, I meant the 48. Oops!

I have a 17, 19, and 26....all Gen4. The 19 IS easier to conceal than the 17, but not by a ton. I have successfully concealed my 17, but I’m more likely to OC it. The 19 is pretty much my EDC. As a range gun, I much prefer the 17....although the 19 shoots just fine. It’s just that the slightly larger grip size and longer slide of the 17 give a better sight radius, and it’s slightly softer shooting. Just as if I HAD to narrow my ARs down to one, I’d choose my 20” A4; if I had to narrow my Glocks down to just one, I’d probably choose the 17.

That said, if I were going to buy a NEW Glock, I’d give both the 19x and the 45 a really hard look. And you can get 15 round mags that flush fit the single stack 45.