I agree. My point was more to the notion that I don't want a car accident either, but I make sure that my cars have seat belts, and I actually use them; while conversely, the other side doesn't have seat belts, and wouldn't wear them if they did, but would feel entitled to take mine if they changed their minds.G.A. Heath wrote:The sad truth of the matter is we have too many elements that feel a violent solution is the answer to our problems. First off we have the "#FeelTheBern" and the "#ThrillOnTheHill" crowds who think just enough violence and revolution would allow certain parties to take control and implement martial law until the "more educated" people could replace that annoying constitution with something a little more socialist. Then we have the "#PortsFortsAnd10SquareMiles" crowd who feel this is the ideal time to "Kick It Off" and push the reset button so that our country can go back to 1890 vintage governance.
The reality is that we really want neither of these sides to get their way because the constitution gets shredded either way. Revolutions tend to devolve into warlord controlled regions with lawlessness running rampant and freedom being forbidden to all but the warlords and their friends. In reality they are two sides of the same coin, and it's value is less than what you can get for it as scrap. Should we see a revolution start because of these idiots I call dibs on the position of "Warlord of West Texas".
Search found 2 matches
Return to “SOROS FUNDED MOVEON.ORG TAKES CREDIT FOR VIOLENCE IN CHICAGO”
- Sun Mar 13, 2016 9:28 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: SOROS FUNDED MOVEON.ORG TAKES CREDIT FOR VIOLENCE IN CHICAGO
- Replies: 31
- Views: 4417
Re: SOROS FUNDED MOVEON.ORG TAKES CREDIT FOR VIOLENCE IN CHICAGO
- Sun Mar 13, 2016 10:19 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: SOROS FUNDED MOVEON.ORG TAKES CREDIT FOR VIOLENCE IN CHICAGO
- Replies: 31
- Views: 4417
Re: SOROS FUNDED MOVEON.ORG TAKES CREDIT FOR VIOLENCE IN CHICAGO
If they do want it, they are singularly stupid. We, as supporters and exercisers of the 2nd Amendment, are far more prepared for something like that than they are. Actually, I don't want it either because to seriously want such a catastrophe would be unwise — but unlike those crazies on the left, I've actually considered the possibility of violently transformative social unrest/collapse, and have been preparing accordingly. Those idiots are like the grasshopper who played the summer away while the ant worked, and I'm sure they think that they are entitled to a share of my assets in that event, but they will find singularly hard and bitter cheese at my property line.Bitter Clinger wrote:Black Lies Matter, Move-on, Occupy, etc., appear to want a civil war. Maybe they will get their wish?
http://www.infowars.com/soros-funded-mo ... n-chicago/