Sent you a PM.E.Marquez wrote:Would you be so kind as to send me the build sheet for this gun........You did an outstanding job the last time making gathering parts a breeze.The Annoyed Man wrote:Oh for sure, it will weigh more. That sig is a nifty little gun. Heck, the 220 grain .308 bullets alone will weigh more than an entire 9mm cartridge. But I'm going to build my SBR as light as I can. It will sit on the same Spikes Gen II billet lower you already fired at our range day a few weeks ago. The Spikes Gen II Billet receiver halves together are really light (1.65 lbs combined). I'm using a Minimalist stock (5.8 oz), and the barrel I'm going to use weighs 1 lb 6 oz. The entire package is going to weigh 5.8 lb when it is finished — unloaded with optic and mount included.
I'm not to worried about weight.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “9mm subguns and the power of marketing”
- Wed Apr 20, 2016 2:01 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: 9mm subguns and the power of marketing
- Replies: 27
- Views: 9151
Re: 9mm subguns and the power of marketing
- Fri Mar 04, 2016 10:04 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: 9mm subguns and the power of marketing
- Replies: 27
- Views: 9151
Re: 9mm subguns and the power of marketing
Oh for sure, it will weigh more. That sig is a nifty little gun. Heck, the 220 grain .308 bullets alone will weigh more than an entire 9mm cartridge. But I'm going to build my SBR as light as I can. It will sit on the same Spikes Gen II billet lower you already fired at our range day a few weeks ago. The Spikes Gen II Billet receiver halves together are really light (1.65 lbs combined). I'm using a Minimalist stock (5.8 oz), and the barrel I'm going to use weighs 1 lb 6 oz. The entire package is going to weigh 5.8 lb when it is finished — unloaded with optic and mount included.
I'm not to worried about weight.
I'm not to worried about weight.
- Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:42 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: 9mm subguns and the power of marketing
- Replies: 27
- Views: 9151
Re: 9mm subguns and the power of marketing
For the record, in my particular case, I am building a 10.5" SBR in .300 Blk, primarily for CQB, and that is where I was coming from.Bitter Clinger wrote:Cause it's not just about momentum transfer at the point of impact. It's about the right tool for the application. No one will use a pistol caliber carbine for hog hunting or expect it to turn cover into concealment like a rifle round.The Annoyed Man wrote:Lately, I'm more in the Kel-Tec Sub-2000 price range.
A 9mm sub gun sounds like fun, but ammo cost aside, why would it be any more effective than a .300 Blk for SD?
Yes, you can ping steel with a 9mm at 100 yards, but you can do that with a 1911 .45 too. But with a .300 Blk 220 grain subsonic load 10ft from the muzzle, you have velocity/energy of 1,061 fps/541 ft-lbs, and at 100 yards you still have 1,012 fps/500 ft-lbs. how much retained velocity/energy does a 9mm have at 100 yards, particularly if you were shooting suppressed subsonics? That's my thought anyway.
But if I am in a CQB situation, making a quick vehicle exit or clearing rooms under stress, I prefer the SBR to a full length bbl with a can hanging off it.
Now, yes, anyone can hit a full size steel target at 100 yards with a 9mm handgun, but if that target at distance is returning fire,I prefer the longer bbl, a shoulder mount, and a red dot. Fast and accurate target acquisition, especially if the enemy is under cover, is clearly less advantageous with just a pistol.
Carry on......
- Fri Mar 04, 2016 12:58 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: 9mm subguns and the power of marketing
- Replies: 27
- Views: 9151
Re: 9mm subguns and the power of marketing
Lately, I'm more in the Kel-Tec Sub-2000 price range.
A 9mm sub gun sounds like fun, but ammo cost aside, why would it be any more effective than a .300 Blk for SD?
Yes, you can ping steel with a 9mm at 100 yards, but you can do that with a 1911 .45 too. But with a .300 Blk 220 grain subsonic load 10ft from the muzzle, you have velocity/energy of 1,061 fps/541 ft-lbs, and at 100 yards you still have 1,012 fps/500 ft-lbs. how much retained velocity/energy does a 9mm have at 100 yards, particularly if you were shooting suppressed subsonics? That's my thought anyway.
A 9mm sub gun sounds like fun, but ammo cost aside, why would it be any more effective than a .300 Blk for SD?
Yes, you can ping steel with a 9mm at 100 yards, but you can do that with a 1911 .45 too. But with a .300 Blk 220 grain subsonic load 10ft from the muzzle, you have velocity/energy of 1,061 fps/541 ft-lbs, and at 100 yards you still have 1,012 fps/500 ft-lbs. how much retained velocity/energy does a 9mm have at 100 yards, particularly if you were shooting suppressed subsonics? That's my thought anyway.