You're right.... the text of SB 273 does not mention 30.07........30.06 yes, but not 30.07. My guess is that this is not accidental, but we'll see. If it was an oversight, it will be hotly debated in the next session.OldAg wrote:Doesn't SB273 just prohibit public entities from posting 30.06 signs? That would mean that they could post 30.07 signs.
Maybe Charles L. Cotton could shed some light on this?