True, we have just one side.........from a guy who passed a background check, took the test, paid the fees, has a steady job, and responsibly carries a 1911, which he seeks to keep concealed according to the law. At no point did he call her names. He described in what seems like a pretty believable fashion, both their parts in the exchange..........and then we have him reporting that she subsequently called him back to apologize for her behavior.....which pretty much substantiates what he wrote in his OP.scud runner wrote:The story sure reads that way. Maybe you know Sparky personally, but for the rest of us, we only have one side of the story from somebody who joined less than a week ago. I'm going to reserve judgement.The Annoyed Man wrote:He behaved with maturity. She did not..........ages notwithstanding.
I see no inconsistencies here. I tend to give CHL holders the benefit of the doubt, age notwithstanding, when it comes to a judgment of maturity. They have already had to display a measure of that just to get the CHL. Also, I have met a number of 25 year old combat veterans who were far more mature than many men much their seniors. My dad matured on Iwo Jima at age 22.
I have also met plenty of men my own age (61) who behave like children. It's OK to reserve judgement. I just don't see any need to this time around. That's just me. YMMV.