Search found 2 matches

by The Annoyed Man
Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:57 pm
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: How is the .45 1911 Compact/subcompact?
Replies: 27
Views: 4359

Re: How is the .45 1911 Compact/subcompact?

x007x wrote:Anyone own the SF range officer 1911?
You mean the SA Range Officer? No. I do own a SA Loaded model. Nice gun.
by The Annoyed Man
Mon Feb 18, 2013 2:01 pm
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: How is the .45 1911 Compact/subcompact?
Replies: 27
Views: 4359

Re: How is the .45 1911 Compact/subcompact?

My own experience with a 3" Kimber was very positive, however there are other 1911 aficionados of this board who would rather chew on a lit dynamite stick than buy a Kimber. If I were you, I would also take a look at Springfield Armory 1911s, as they usually have a product comparable to any given Kimber product, they make very high quality pistols, and they are close enough in pricing for horseshoes or hand grenades. I eventually sold my Kimber and hung onto my Springfield, but only because if a man has to be reduced to one 1911, it should be a 5" model. If the Kimber had been a 5" model and the SA a 3" model, I would have kept the Kimber and sold the SA. I have moderate regrets about having sold my Kimber, but that sale made a couple of other things possible for me, so it's all good.

Return to “How is the .45 1911 Compact/subcompact?”