Thank you.Topbuilder wrote:Gameover wrote:
Let me take care of this one for you TAM,
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Return to “Piers and Dana Loesch”
Thank you.Topbuilder wrote:Gameover wrote:
Let me take care of this one for you TAM,
There is more, but at its core, the article reveals Morgan to be an utterly unprincipled man, over anything.....not just gun rights. This is just his latest ratings driver. STOP WATCHING HIM! Tell your friends to stop watching him. He doesn't even serve liberal causes particularly well because he is so polarizing that he alienates even the vast middle ground. Just stop watching him. Stop posting his videos, because they help to drive his ratings. Just ignore him. He is a boil on the posterior of politics and culture. Let him stew in his own rot, and don't help to stir him up.American conservatives have found themselves a new and unlikely bogeyman in the shape of (my fellow) Brit Piers Morgan, whose profile in the U.S. has risen in recent weeks as a result of his theatrical contributions to the debate over guns.
Morgan’s rudeness to pro-gun guests, dismissive attitude to the U.S. Constitution and the Bible, and generally anti-conservative tone have led his detractors to call him a liberal. The fact that he’s British has added an element of B-movie villainy, as if Morgan were a haughty redcoat general intent on personally confiscating Americans’ guns.
But while he may walk the liberal walk and talk the liberal talk, Morgan is no liberal; he has no discernible political philosophy. He’s an unprincipled, relentlessly self-promoting opportunist, a disgraced tabloid hack who doesn’t care whom he offends or how foolish he looks as long as he’s the center of attention. Morgan’s stance on a given subject is determined not by ideology, but by what will generate the most controversy, get him the most coverage, and strengthen his hand when negotiating his next book or TV deal. His efforts been given added urgency of late by the need to boost the paltry ratings of his CNN show.
Conservatives, unfortunately, have fallen for Morgan’s shtick. And the more they rise to his bait, the more coverage Morgan gets — allowing him to absurdly claim that he’s influencing the debate.
Satisfying as it was to see Ben Shapiro put Morgan in his place, even when conservatives get the better of him they’re still conferring credibility by treating him as someone worth their time. And when lunatics and conspiracy theorists claiming to speak for conservatives, such as Alex Jones, tangle with Morgan, he’s able to come away looking reasonable, while gun owners and conservatives in general are tarred by association.
Supporters of gun rights need to get their message out; there are well-informed and serious people on the other side of the debate with whom they need to engage. Piers Morgan isn’t one of them — stop granting him the publicity.