Search found 2 matches

by The Annoyed Man
Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:20 am
Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: UPDATE: 1/10/13
Replies: 50
Views: 8742

Re: UPDATE: 1/10/13

TexasCajun wrote:As onerous as our CHL process seems to be (as compared to other states), I say that if you are a Texas resident, then you should have a Texas CHL. But I don't agree with entrenching that sentiment into law. If there were substantial issues with the qualifications for a state issuing non-resident carry licenses, then that could be easitly be handled through reciprocity. In other words, if the AG believes that simply mailing in a fee to get the non-resident license is too lenient, then simply refuse to recognize the non-resident license without affecting the reciprocity of the resident license.
Isn't that the governor's decision, not the AG's?
by The Annoyed Man
Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:19 am
Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: UPDATE: 1/10/13
Replies: 50
Views: 8742

Re: UPDATE: 1/10/13

Charles L. Cotton wrote:I don't like this bill and I don't want it to pass. The fact that Lon Burnam is rated F is the best thing we have going for us. That said, requiring Texans to have a Texas CHL will not impact reciprocity. In fact, a few states have already passed such legislation and more are going to do so as time goes on. We can thank those like the online Virginia instructor/class for this bill being filed again.

The best approach is to remove the incentives to get out of state licenses like reducing the time required for the initial CHL and removing successfully completed deferred adjudications from the definition of "conviction."

Chas.
Isn't this his second attempt to introduce this bill? I seem to remember him doing it last session in response to all those people pushing the Utah CFP as a way to get around the Texas requirements. And also, didn't Utah pass a new law back then preventing the issuance of a non-resident CFP to anyone who does not first have a carry license from their state of residency? I recall Utah being legitimately worried about loss of reciprocity with other states because of non-residents who were using the CFP to get around their own states' requirements.

Return to “UPDATE: 1/10/13”