VMI77 wrote:
Humorous? Really? I'm curious what you think makes it even worth reading? Between the article and the comments, it's an endless tirade about how all Republicans are: stupid, greedy, hate women, hate minorities, evil, dark (versus the "light" shed by Democrats), reptilian, deluded, selfish, ruthless, unAmerican extremists, barbaric, decadent, racist, Nazis, unenlightened, retrogressive evil lying white people who should be "wiped from the earth." And the vast majority of commenters share this hatred and intolerance (every descriptor used here came from either the article or was repeated in the comment section). What's funny about that?
There's nothing funny about it. It is beyond comprehension that these people believe themselves to be thinkers, and it is terrifying that they vote. We truly are at the "bread and circuses" phase in the decline of the Founders' immaculate vision. It only required a virtuous people to sustain us. The left, by having co-opted the educational system, information media, and entertainment, have completely and successfully marginalized virtue, and with that will come the end of the experiment begun in 1776.
There is one single remaining tactic available to us, and that is for all conservative/libertarians in Congress to vote "present" on all bills EXCEPT anything affecting the 2nd Amendment. Make that the single flagpole around which ALL conservatives can unite. During the debates on the floor, let republicans speak out against the bills brought forth by democrats, but when it comes time to vote... vote "present." Let the democrats OWN every. single. blow. that will fall on the American taxpayer AND the American parasite alike. Let them own it. Let things get SO bad, and SO painful, that when people complain, conservatives will be able to legitimately say, "I
TOLD you so, but you wouldn't listen."
The only way to make a witch like Maureen Dowd shut up is to let her keep spewing her black-hearted crap until the barnyard product hits the oscillating ventilation device. At that point, people will willingly stop reading her editorial vomit, and with any luck at all, the NYT will finally give up the ghost. I wonder if Rupert Murdoch will still be around to buy it when that happens? It would be poetic justice if he wound up being her boss and had the chance to fire her himself.
