I understand, but that isn't how Andy shot in the video, which I presumed was the course of fire he was proposing. I might not be right in the particulars of how to address it, but I was mainly trying to convey an element of target selection into the drill, which is more like real life, rather than having a standardized "shoot the guy on the left, then shoot the guy on the right;" and also to introduce the variable of "handedness" for the shooter. After all, in real life, regardless of how may rounds you serve each target with, you're going to have to make a decision on who to shoot first, how many times, based on which is the biggest danger of the two. It seems to me that target selection is going to be the first priority, regardless of whether you shoot the first one twice, the second one twice, and the first one a third time; or shoot the first once, the second twice, and the first twice more.Excaliber wrote:There's another tactical consideration here. In a 2 BG confrontation at short range, both are likely to be nearly equal threats. Firing 3 rounds at one while not engaging the other at all until the 4th round leaves #2 enough free time to effectively counter and ruin the defender's day.
Shooting 1 round COM on the first, followed by a double tap on the second, and another 1 or 2 on the first followed by more on the second if the threat remains is regarded by many as the best solution for a very dangerous problem.
OTH, if there is no particular significance to his shooting of FIVE rounds, then maybe I've just posted twice for no particularly good reason.