Obama is Carter in drag. So.... no, I wouldn't.KD5NRH wrote:No; you've dodged the important question. Since Carter could run again, would you vote for him over Obama?The Annoyed Man wrote:But even with his poor record on gun rights, I would vote for Reagan over Obama at the drop of a hat. I would vote for Mongo (with or without his candygram) over Obama. I would vote for the Humpback of Notre Dame over Obama. I would vote for Olive Oyle over Obama.........I think I've made my point.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Young Conservatives of Texas-Spec Session-CampusCarry”
- Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:34 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Young Conservatives of Texas-Spec Session-CampusCarry
- Replies: 25
- Views: 3731
Re: Young Conservatives of Texas-Spec Session-CampusCarry
- Thu Jun 16, 2011 9:50 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Young Conservatives of Texas-Spec Session-CampusCarry
- Replies: 25
- Views: 3731
Re: Young Conservatives of Texas-Spec Session-CampusCarry
That's reasonable. Unlike you, I'm still undecided about the primary, the one exception being that I wouldn't vote for Ron Paul to be dog catcher.Tamie wrote:No campus carry in the special session means no vote for Perry in the primaries from me and most people I know.
In a choice between Obama and Perry yes. But that's not the choice we have in the primaries.
- Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:41 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Young Conservatives of Texas-Spec Session-CampusCarry
- Replies: 25
- Views: 3731
Re: Young Conservatives of Texas-Spec Session-CampusCarry
Because he'd be better than 4 more years of Obama, name the issue?blackmesa wrote:On the other hand, considering what's on the agenda, if he doesn't add campus carry, why should American gun owners vote for him?
Look, I'd rather Perry push for campus carry too. But even if he doesn't, the fact remains that he is generally pro-gun, and he will make a generally pro-gun president if elected. I'm not saying he is the best candidate, and I haven't made up my mind yet whom I would vote for in the primary. Even so, if he turns out to be the republican candidate in the general election, he will automatically have my vote. The alternative is 4 more years of Obama. If that's what you would be happy with, then fine, vote for Obama. But if you are truly dedicated to getting him removed from office, you'll vote for a strong republican candidate, regardless of who that is. When Reagan ran for his first term, his big question was, "Are you better off today than you were before?" The answer, after 4 years of Carter, was a resounding "NO!" Reagan took 489 electoral college votes to Carter's 49. It was a wipeout.
Now, I remember Reagan fondly. But lest we color our lenses with too much rose, Governor Ronald Reagan of California signed the Mulford Act in 1967, "prohibiting the carrying of firearms on one's person or in a vehicle, in any public place or on any public street." The law was aimed at stopping the Black Panthers, but affected all gun owners. (SOURCE) Twenty-four years later, Reagan was still pushing gun control. "I support the Brady Bill," he said in a March 28, 1991 speech, "and I urge the Congress to enact it without further delay."
But even with his poor record on gun rights, I would vote for Reagan over Obama at the drop of a hat. I would vote for Mongo (with or without his candygram) over Obama. I would vote for the Humpback of Notre Dame over Obama. I would vote for Olive Oyle over Obama.........I think I've made my point.
So Rick Perry? Sure, I would vote for him over Obama no problem.