Now you've gone and done it. Several of the respondents on this thread are either active or retired law enforcement. I personally know one of them has probably been a cop nearly as long as you've been alive, if not longer. Others here are combat veterans in the nation's various wars. You really are speaking from an uninformed position. I would not go any further down that road unless you're really prepared to back it up.JayCee wrote:Statments like this make me think many of you haven't even been in so much as a schoolyard brawl much less an actual self defense scenario. I have, on both counts, several times. Gang members are like cockroaches, they scatter when threatened and are not in greater numbers. Besides that isn't there the chance for escalation in any 'threat of force' scenario?LJM wrote:This is the part that hangs me up.
pulling a gun for .500 of a second and defusing the whole situation
What are the odds of defusing versus escallating the situation. If the OP has done nothing Wrong and the aggresive drivers are intent on harm or the "Gangbanger has just been Challenged!
RETREAT is the safest option.
Also FWIW the word should be defuse, not diffuse. You're removing the fuse fro ma bomb, not misting a plant.
One can have plenty of experience with violence, including violence perpetrated by really bad people.... get shot at, legally deploy and use a firearm.... etc., etc., etc., and still have a clear-eyed view as to what the law allows, and what it doesn't - most particularly when that is their damned job to know it, unlike you. You certainly don't have to pay any attention to what they say if you don't want to, but it would be foolish on your part if you don't, and it becomes a waste of their time. Those members who have posted opinions opposite to your own have taking the time to do so because they have a genuine interest in helping you to get squared away in your understanding of the law. You don't appear to be inclined to take advantage of the advice.
Earlier in the thread, you said: "I don't currently have a CHL so I'm not familiar with the law 100%. I'm just trying to get as much info from the experts here as I can." That turns out not to be the case. What you're looking for, in truth, is for someone to endorse your misunderstanding of the law, and you're not finding it. So you argue about it, and disrespect their experience?
Please. Do me a favor. Pay, like the rest of us have paid, to take a CHL class, and get taught exactly what you've been told here. Then argue with your CHL teacher about it. Maybe he'll refund your money and throw away your paperwork. Maybe then you'll be convinced.
Or not. I don't care.