Search found 5 matches

by The Annoyed Man
Tue May 25, 2010 6:13 pm
Forum: New to CHL?
Topic: Secure compliance vs. Convertible Automobile
Replies: 45
Views: 6324

Re: Secure compliance vs. Convertible Automobile

TxRVer wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:I spotted a fallacy, and then I'm done...
CHL we know requires one to secure their weapons when unattended.
I just searched through the law as downloaded from the DPS website. The word "secure" occurs on 7 pages. None of the references are to a CHL holder being required to secure his/her weapon when unattended. So that is just not true.

Now, it would foolish not to do so using a lockbox, but so far as I can tell, hiding your gun under the seat and locking your car would qualify as "secured" for legal purposes.

I smell sulfur in the air... Are there any trolls hiding under bridges nearby? :smilelol5:
That sure sounded a lot like an opinion. :nono: :smilelol5:
Sure 'nuf did. I also said I was done with the thread, but it seems to be turning around, so what the heck, why not? :mrgreen:
by The Annoyed Man
Tue May 25, 2010 5:55 pm
Forum: New to CHL?
Topic: Secure compliance vs. Convertible Automobile
Replies: 45
Views: 6324

Re: Secure compliance vs. Convertible Automobile

Islands7 wrote:
Keith B wrote:And, BTW on your off-limits locaitons, you are not required to leave your CCW behind when going into a church unless it is 30.06 posted or you have recevied oral notification to not carry there.
OK, help me with this reading & yes I am new:
PC §46.035. UNLAWFUL CARRYING OF HANDGUN BY LICENSE
HOLDER.

(6) on the premises of a church, synagogue, or other established
place of religious worship.
You didn't read far enough. A few paragraphs further down, it says that a church, synagogue or other place of religious worship must post a 30.06 sign to keep CHL out, which means that the default position is that church carry is legal. Your instructor, if competent, should have pointed that out to you. In fact, a number of us not only carry in church, we carry on stage and in the pulpit in church.
Security
Our concealed class taught that unsecured firearms that endanger a child will be dealt with via Texas law. I will try to find that & post, if interested.
True, but you should not be leaving your children alone in the convertible car — particularly during a Texas summer — regardless of whether there is a gun secured in the car or not. Children die every year from being left in locked cars during summer by thoughtless parents
I would think this might have been stretched even to stolen guns later used in a crime but memory fails .....
I'm not going to buy that one. If you report a gun stolen and it gets used in a crime, I'm pretty sure you have no criminal legal liability. You are the victim, not the perpetrator.
Experience
Also note that if anyone has first hand experiences with real-world law enforcement consequences that dealt with convertibles vs. security or lack of security of concealed firearms, this would be very enlightening.
I doubt you would get much in the way of answers. If a car is locked, ragtop or not, and it get's broken into and a gun is stolen, the onus is on the criminal who stole it, not on the victim of the crime. And unless the gun is in plain view, no law is being broken.... ....as long as you are legally allowed to own/possess a firearm.
by The Annoyed Man
Tue May 25, 2010 10:29 am
Forum: New to CHL?
Topic: Secure compliance vs. Convertible Automobile
Replies: 45
Views: 6324

Re: Secure compliance vs. Convertible Automobile

seamusTX wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:I smell sulfur in the air... Are there any trolls hiding under bridges nearby?
Now don't play the troll card until he asks three questions before you can cross the bridge.

Oh, wait.

To the OP: No hard feelings. You're had your baptism by fire. :cheers2:

- Jim
Is the bridge posted 30.06? :smilelol5:
by The Annoyed Man
Tue May 25, 2010 9:48 am
Forum: New to CHL?
Topic: Secure compliance vs. Convertible Automobile
Replies: 45
Views: 6324

Re: Secure compliance vs. Convertible Automobile

I spotted a fallacy, and then I'm done...
CHL we know requires one to secure their weapons when unattended.
I just searched through the law as downloaded from the DPS website. The word "secure" occurs on 7 pages. None of the references are to a CHL holder being required to secure his/her weapon when unattended. So that is just not true.

Now, it would foolish not to do so using a lockbox, but so far as I can tell, hiding your gun under the seat and locking your car would qualify as "secured" for legal purposes.

I smell sulfur in the air... Are there any trolls hiding under bridges nearby? :smilelol5:
by The Annoyed Man
Tue May 25, 2010 9:29 am
Forum: New to CHL?
Topic: Secure compliance vs. Convertible Automobile
Replies: 45
Views: 6324

Re: Secure compliance vs. Convertible Automobile

Islands7 wrote:This topic is not looking for opinions, as plenty of these can be found elsewhere on this site.
CHL we know requires one to secure their weapons when unattended.
The scenario here is - one drives their convertible "rag top" into the parking lot of church/school/post office/etc. and must secure their weapon in this car when entering such buildings.
The most obvious compliance would be one of those lockboxes that steel cable to one of the car's fixed metal pieces - but is this purchase really necessary, as per the law?
These other solutions need to be addressed by those closer to the law or have real-life experiences (again, no opinions please!).
These "solutions" assume locked doors, top up & locked in place, trunk locked AND that "concealed" does not equal "secured":
1. Inside locked glove box
2. Inside unlocked or unlockable glove box
3. Concealed inside other unlockable compartments, e.g. center console, door map pocket (covered by towel/rag), "hidden compartment",Inside running board concealed under seat, etc.
4. Inside trunk
5. Inside lockable tool box that resides on & is secured (by concealed bolts) to running board (older cars)
6. Inside locked luggage secured to outside luggage rack; further how secure does the luggage have to be to be compliant; or does the weapon have to be inside a lockbox inside the luggage if not secured legally?
Welcome to the board... Wow. First post... Blue in 150% font size in case we can't read it otherwise.... and on a discussion board where people discuss their opinions, we are invited by a member who has never posted before to not participate...

Since I'm not even sure what the purpose of the thread is in the first place, and since I've been disinvited to comment, I'm done with this thread...

Good luck in your future endeavors. :roll:

Return to “Secure compliance vs. Convertible Automobile”