TexasCHLforum.com

Paladin wrote: ↑Mon Sep 02, 2024 9:35 am Extremists are on the run: Why Did Zuckerberg Choose Now To Confess?

Every dissident, and every normal person who had some sense that something odd was going on, was made to feel like some sort of crazy cretin who held nutty and probably dangerous views that were completely out of touch with the mainstream.

People like me had come to believe that average people were simply cowards or stupid not to object. Now we know that this might not have been true at all! The people who objected were simply silenced!

Consider how many other elections were affected. It’s astonishing to think of the implications of this. It means that quite possibly an entire generation of elected leaders in this country was not legitimately elected, if by legitimate we mean a well-informed public that is given a choice concerning the issues that affect their lives.

When you think about it this way, this is not just some minor error in judgment. This was an earth-shattering decision that goes way beyond managerial cowardice. It goes beyond even election manipulation. It is an outright coup that overthrew an entire generation of leaders who stood up for freedom and replaced them with a generation of leaders who acquiesced to power exactly at the time it mattered the most.

Paladin wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2024 9:41 pm James O'Keefe found some new extremists at the DOD:



Dept. of Defense Worker Says "Take All the Guns," Use the National Guard

Paladin wrote: ↑Mon Jul 17, 2023 11:06 am It seems the Justice Department is more interested in censorship and propaganda than justice:

The Justice Department’s request for a temporary halt was granted

Appeals Court Halts Order Blocking Government’s Censorship Collusion with Big Tech

What's happening: A proposal to give federal lawmakers the legal right to scrub personal info about them and their family members from the internet is facing resistance from pro-transparency groups, who fear that the measure could interfere with watchdog journalism.

Details: Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who are offering the legislation as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act, contend the protections are needed as federal officials and their families face an onslaught of threats to their personal safety from disgruntled constituents and others.

Klobuchar's take: Speaking to a federal judges conference in Minnesota Friday, Klobuchar touted the legislation as a logical extension of a bill Congress passed late last year giving judges the right to take down personal details like home addresses and employers of family members.

cherokeepilot wrote: ↑Thu Sep 29, 2022 12:30 am On FBI surveillance: "We wanted a president who listens to all Americans -- now we have one

srothstein wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 10:27 pm I have searched carefully for extremism in my household. I did not find any signs of anyone even thinking about supporting Antifa or BLM.