Watch out - you might give the prosecutor ideas about another line of attack against the homeowner . . . maybe something along the lines of "Failure to provide for the safety of arsonists . . ."stroo wrote:I would like to know how Borden managed to get his house to counterattack The guys trying to burn it down though!
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Florida Castle Doctrine case...”
- Mon Jul 02, 2007 8:46 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Florida Castle Doctrine case...
- Replies: 22
- Views: 2997
- Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:27 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Florida Castle Doctrine case...
- Replies: 22
- Views: 2997
Interesting quote in the original story from the prosecutor:
The truth hurt him?!?
Wonder if that's just a poor choice of words, or an indication of a rather odious mindset on his part . . . and if he knew the truth as he prosecuted the case . . .
Notice the last sentence where the prosecutor says "The truth hurt me . . . ""This case kind of stands on its own," Williams said. "They were bringing a lot of violence to this defendant. I don't think the new law made any difference. The truth hurt me in this case."
The truth hurt him?!?
Wonder if that's just a poor choice of words, or an indication of a rather odious mindset on his part . . . and if he knew the truth as he prosecuted the case . . .